02 February, 2010
Madness
16 October, 2009
Credit rating
06 October, 2009
Flag Revival
19 September, 2009
Amazing!
22 June, 2009
Austerity
Government announces civil service salary cuts as part of austerity measures. This circular
letter from the Department of Public Administration to all public servants has just been sent to me for comment. I have not checked with anyone to make sure it is authentic. I take it on trust as the source is dependable. I have read it.
Department of Public Administration
The
The Valley
REF: EST/5/10
GOVERNMENT CIRCULAR NO. 4 OF 8 JUNE 2009
TO: Permanent Secretaries
Hon. Attorney General
Department Heads
All Public Officers
H E, The Governor (for information)
Ministers of Government (for information)
AUSTERITY MEASURES
On Wednesday June 3, 2009 Executive Council agreed to the following for a period of six months in the first instance, effective July 1, 2009, to sharply reduce expenditure:-
(i) the figures for travel allowance categories A to E will be as follows:-
($225.00, $175.00, $125.00, $75.00, $62.50 respectively);
Council further agreed that travel allowance categories should be continuously reviewed to ensure that officers are placed in the correct categories.
(ii) telephone allowance will remain at the current reduced level;
(iii) salary payments be reduced by the amounts set out below:-
a) Hon Deputy Governor, Hon Attorney
General and Public Officers in grades A-F - 10%
Public Officers in grades G-M - 5%
Public Officers in grades A-F who did not receive the 25% salary increase in September 2008 should have the increase actually received reduced using the following formula to determine the percentage reduction (10 ÷ 25 x % increase in salary actually received in September 2008 = % amount current salary to be reduced by). This is proposed exceptionally on moral grounds particularly as persons would have made financial commitments based on their prior salary. This exception must not be construed as giving affected persons any rights or benefits that they would not have otherwise accrued.
b) All elected Members of HoA - 15% (of ministerial and HoA allowances)
Speaker and Nominated Members - 5%
Special Assistants/Advisers/
Specialist Worker - 10%
Wage Workers - 5%
(iv) pensioners will not be affected by any reductions;
(v) officers retiring during the temporary salary suspension period will be afforded their retirement benefits (gratuity and pension) based on their current salary and not at the reduced salary;
(vi) all officers including “contract” officers will be subject to the temporary suspension of benefits;
(vii) the
Council noted that the
Public Administration acknowledges the historic nature of these measures and the personal sacrifice officers will be required to make. However, it is hoped that public officers will recognize the seriousness of the situation and understand that the measures being instituted come after considerable deliberation.
Public Administration continues to urge officers, especially at this time, to remain vigilant in the collection of government revenues, be professional in the performance of designated duties and practice sound work ethics.
------------------------------------------------
Lana Horsford-Harrigan
Director Human Resource Management
Public Administration
Copy – Honourable Deputy Governor
Here are my comments.
First, let me say that everyone in
The memorandum makes it clear, if only by inference, that the proposed reduction was determined on by the Executive Council without discussion with either the public service or their representatives. There is no question of seeking to obtain the consent of the civil servants whose salaries will be affected. They are being told of a decision that has been made. The decision is “effective July 1”, by which I understand that salaries will be cut from July 2009. The lack of consultation and the failure even to try to secure prior agreement is unbelievably inconsiderate and unacceptable if true. Tell me which employer in
The third paragraph from the bottom, with the words “commit to giving back the suspended funds”, etc, makes it clear that the Executive Council believes that it has the right to take away the proposed salary cuts permanently. This is not guaranteed to be a temporary suspension, it is to be a possibly permanent cut in salary. That is contrary to section 7 of the Constitution of Anguilla. This letter infringes the “property rights” section of the Constitution, and as such is illegal.
One thing that is guaranteed to get me really vexed is when I see government not bothering to take legal advice on a matter of great importance and obvious contention such as this. This proposal is the wholesale cutting of salaries. That is a matter of great importance of obvious contention. There are civil servants who are already living at the limit of their means. There are house mortgages, car loans, university loans, vacation loans, and personal loans for furniture, all expected to be paid on time. Any reduction will call for civil servants to have to begin negotiations with creditors and other persons to whom there are obligations.
That is why I would contend that no competent department of public administration could possibly have circulated this memorandum without first having sought legal advice. And, I would go further and state that no lawyer in a West Indian Attorney-General’s Chambers could possibly have o-kayed it. Both contentions cannot be right. One must be wrong. The conclusion is that either the department took a risk, or the A-G’s Chambers was careless.
I know it is a long time ago, but government must retain files. About the year 1982 Verna Fahie was a young civil servant. She was sent by government on a Canadian scholarship to
In what way is the proposed new cut any different from what was done to Verna Fahie?
Come on, public admin, get their consent first.
14 June, 2009
Viceroy Delayed
The July “soft opening” has just got even softer. As recently as a week ago, 8 June, the Hon Minister of Finance, Victor Banks, gave a reassuring speech over Radio Anguilla about Viceroy being “well on the way to a soft opening in July". This, he said, will result in the employment of a number of Anguillian workers. Certainly, as of that date the Viceroy management had not informed him that there was likely to be any delay in the previously announced soft opening scheduled for 1 July 2009.
To go back in time a bit, we will all remember that the original soft opening was supposed to have been in December 2008.
Then, they announced that the opening was delayed until 1 April 2009.
Later, that date was quietly changed to 1 June without anyone giving any explanation.
I wonder what the investors in apartments or villas made of these repeated delays and disappointments. The amounts of money they had to commit were huge. Contracts were signed and deposits made on the promise that the project would be completed before December 2008:
Prospective purchasers committed large sums of money on a promise of a 2008 opening
I wonder how many deposits National Bank of Anguilla financed? The risk is that some of these purchasers, badly hit by the current recession that began only after they signed the contracts, will not complete their purchases and will not repay the bank loans.
Then, in May of this year, a visit to the Viceroy website indicated that reservations were not being taken for June any longer. They were only accepting reservations starting 1 July.
This delay was a big concern for us in
“He said the increase in revenue of $4 million over the 2008 figure was mainly expected from Stamp Duties resulting from alien landholders’ licenses to be issued to purchasers of real estate when the Viceroy project opens for operation in 2009.”
Now comes the latest disappointment. Viceroy has, as of yesterday, just quietly stopped taking reservations for July. Its website shows that the planned resort now has its reservations commencing in August.
Viceroy online reservations now permits bookings only as of August 2009
Those persons who made reservations for July are being assigned rooms at Cap Juluca and Cuisinart. They have begun to question what is going on:
Yesterday's complaint on Trip Advisor about a cancellation of a reservation
There has not been any public announcement by Viceroy or anyone in government, far less the media. I would have thought that the event would have made the news. But, maybe, no one in government or the media knows yet.
The Hurricane Season has already begun.
I am sorry to be the one to have to tell Victor, but our 2009 Budget has just taken another hit. There will be no revenue from Viceroy for the first half of 2009.
There is a further concern. How can there be any expectation that Anguillians who were banking on taking up employment with Viceroy in 2009 will hang around to see if the Hotel will really open in August? If I were paranoid, I would ask if it is possible that these last minute changes could be partly designed to ensure there are no Anguillians available for employment when they do really open? Or, is there some more serious systemic problem that we do not know about?
In my humble opinion, we will be lucky to see any revenue at all from Viceroy for the balance of 2009. In my view it is unlikely that there will be any Anguillians employed at Viceroy for the foreseeable future.
The Labour Department better start hiring an interpreter qualified in Tagalog.
Related posts:
27 June 2007: Slave Labour
28 June 2007: Hunger Strike
22 July 2007: Kor Realty Group
20 January 2009: Soft Opening
26 February 2009: Barnes Bay
15 March 2009: Meads Bay
29 May 2009: Pinoys






























