NICA 10.
Hodge was the duly appointed Manager of the National Investment Company of Anguilla Ltd. He made a recommendation to the Board to invest in the shares of a subsidiary of Motorola. It was a company known as Iridium World Communications Ltd. The Board agreed. The investment was made.
Iridium was highly visible on the international stock markets, the telecommunications industry, and investors worldwide. It was well known because it was venturing into parts unknown. Its ideas were pioneering in nature. It was a high-risk stock. The technology required to do what Iridium wanted was unproven. The cost involved and the ability of the company to raise the funds required was uncertain. Investing in this stock was an obvious risk. Established investors were extremely nervous about buying these shares.
electronics engineer. He recommended otherwise. The Board was willing to take the risk. They authorized Mr Hodge to invest US$110,775.00, or some EC$300,000.00, in Iridium. The share price began to fall. NICA did not sell, but held on to the investment until it was entirely lost.
Mr Hodge told him that he had also purchased Iridium shares for himself. He had sold his shares when the price began to fall, and had been able to save part of his investment. He had not sold the NICA shares. George Kentish, NICA’s Chairman, told Mr Thomas that he had also invested in Iridium and lost his investment.
the biggest loss in the history of NICA so far as investments are concerned. The company could have avoided the loss. In its prospectus offer, the company had promised that it would employ competent and experienced persons. In this case, NICA did employ competent brokers in the form of Salomon Smith Barney, but they ignored their advice. Mr Thomas concludes that the Directors must take responsibility for the loss of EC$300,000.00 which resulted from the Iridium share purchase.
Please explain the legal consequences of "taking responsibility." This concept seems to have a special Anguillian definition not found elsewhere. For example, saying, "I recognize that we should have acted differently" qualifies as "taking responsibility."
ReplyDeleteIt is commonly accepted that when a mistake is made in Anguilla one must announce that "any inconvenience is sincerely regretted" and the blame can be laid upon conditions "beyond our control" and that is the end of it. This sort of thing passes for "taking responsibility." It is an innovative departure in civil law.